BET inhibitor nanotherapy halts kidney damage and reduces chronic kidney disease progression after ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Targeting epigenetic mechanisms has emerged as a potential therapeutic approach for the treatment of kidney diseases. Specifically, inhibiting the bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) domain proteins using the small molecule inhibitor JQ1 has shown promise in preclinical models of acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, its clinical translation faces challenges due to issues with poor pharmacokinetics and side effects. Here, we developed engineered liposomes loaded with JQ1 with the aim of enhancing kidney drug delivery and reducing the required minimum effective dose by leveraging cargo protection. These liposomes efficiently encapsulated JQ1 in both the membrane and core, demonstrating superior therapeutic efficacy compared to freely delivered JQ1 in a mouse model of kidney ischemia-reperfusion injury. JQ1-loaded liposomes (JQ1-NPs) effectively targeted the kidneys and only one administration, one-hour after injury, was enough to decrease the immune cell (neutrophils and monocytes) infiltration to the kidney-an early and pivotal step to prevent damage progression. By inhibiting BRD4, JQ1-NPs suppress the transcription of pro-inflammatory genes, such as cytokines (il-6) and chemokines (ccl2, ccl5). This success not only improved early the kidney function, as evidenced by decreased serum levels of BUN and creatinine in JQ1-NPs-treated mice, along with reduced tissue expression of the damage marker, NGAL, but also halted the production of extracellular matrix proteins (Fsp-1, Fn-1, α-SMA and Col1a1) and the fibrosis development. In summary, this work presents a promising nanotherapeutic strategy for AKI treatment and its progression and provides new insights into renal drug delivery.

Inhibition of BRD4 Attenuates ER Stress-induced Renal Ischemic-Reperfusion Injury.

Renal ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) leads to endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, thereby initiating the unfolded protein response (UPR). When sustained, this response may trigger the inflammation and tubular cell death that acts to aggravate the damage. Here, we show that knockdown of the BET epigenetic reader BRD4 reduces the expression of ATF4 and XBP1 transcription factors under ER stress activation. BRD4 is recruited to the promoter of these highly acetylated genes, initiating gene transcription. Administration of the BET protein inhibitor, JQ1, one hour after renal damage induced by bilateral IRI, reveals reduced expression of ATF4 and XBP1 genes, low KIM-1 and NGAL levels and recovery of the serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen levels. To determine the molecular pathways regulated by ATF4 and XBP1, we performed stable knockout of both transcription factors using CRISPR-Cas9 and RNA sequencing. The pathways triggered under ER stress were mainly XBP1-dependent, associated with an adaptive UPR, and partially regulated by JQ1. Meanwhile, treatment with JQ1 downmodulated most of the pathways regulated by ATF4 and related to the pathological processes during exacerbated UPR activation. Thus, BRD4 inhibition could be useful for curbing the maladaptive UPR activation mechanisms, thereby ameliorating the progression of renal disease.

Update of the recommendations on the management of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) in kidney transplant patients.

SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19) has had a significant impact on transplant activity in our country. Mortality and the risk of complications associated with COVID-19 in kidney transplant recipients (KT) were expected to be higher due to their immunosuppressed condition and the frequent associated comorbidities. Since the beginning of the pandemic in March 2020 we have rapidly improved our knowledge about the epidemiology, clinical features and management of COVID-19 post-transplant, resulting in a better prognosis for our patients. KT units have been able to adapt their programs to this new reality, normalizing both donation and transplantation activity in our country. This manuscript presents a proposal to update the general recommendations for the prevention and treatment of infection in this highly vulnerable population such as KT.

Actualización de las recomendaciones en el manejo de la pandemia por coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) en pacientes con trasplante renal / Update of the recommendations on the management of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) in kidney transplant patients

La infección por el SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) ha supuesto un importante impacto en la actividad trasplantadora en nuestro país. Era esperable que la mortalidad y el riesgo de complicaciones asociadas a la COVID-19 en el receptor de trasplante renal (TR) fueran mayores debido a su condición de inmunosupresión y a las frecuentes comorbilidades asociadas. Desde el inicio de la pandemia en marzo del 2020 hemos mejorado rápidamente nuestro conocimiento acerca de la epidemiología, características clínicas y manejo de la COVID-19 postrasplante, redundando en un mejor pronóstico para nuestros pacientes. Las unidades de TR han sabido adaptar sus programas a esta nueva realidad, normalizándose la actividad tanto de donación como de trasplante en nuestro país. Este manuscrito presenta una propuesta de actualización de las recomendaciones generales para la prevención y el tratamiento de la infección en esta población tan vulnerable como son los receptores de un trasplante renal. (AU)

SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19) has had a significant impact on transplant activity in our country. Mortality and the risk of complications associated with COVID-19 in kidney transplant (KT) recipients were expected to be higher due to their immunosuppressed condition and the frequent associated comorbidities. Since the beginning of the pandemic in March 2020 we have rapidly improved our knowledge about the epidemiology, clinical features and management of COVID-19 post-transplant, resulting in a better prognosis for our patients. KT units have been able to adapt their programs to this new reality, normalizing both donation and transplantation activity in our country. This manuscript presents a proposal to update the general recommendations for the prevention and treatment of infection in this highly vulnerable population such as KT. (AU)

Enfermedad linfoproliferativa difusa postrasplante renal: estudio longitudinal de 21.546 receptores durante 2 décadas en España / Lymphoproliferative disorders after renal transplantation along 2 decades: A large longitudinal study of 21.546 recipients

Introducción: La enfermedad linfoproliferativa difusa postrasplante (ELPD) es un grupo heterogéneo de enfermedades que se caracteriza por una proliferación de linfocitos después de un trasplante de órgano sólido y que presenta un espectro que comprende desde hiperplasias a agresivos linfomas. Material y métodos: Hemos evaluado, en un estudio observacional multicéntrico retrospectivo que incluye 21.546 receptores adultos de trasplante renal simple trasplantados en España de 1990 al 2009, la incidencia de ELPD durante un periodo de 22 años, su relación con el virus de Epstein-Barr, los factores de riesgo clásico y su pronóstico. Resultados: Un total de 275 receptores desarrollaron ELPD durante el seguimiento (1,2%), siendo 195 varones (70,9%) y 80 mujeres (29,1%), con una mediana de edad al diagnóstico de 59,2 (p25 44,7; p75 68) años. Doscientos cuarenta y cinco (89,0%) eran primeros trasplantes y 269 (97,8%) fueron de donante cadáver. Se objetivó virus de Epstein-Barr en el tejido proliferativo de 94 de los 155 casos estudiados (60,6%) y el 86,0% de las proliferaciones eran linfocitos B. La mediana del tiempo de desarrollo después del trasplante fue de 42 (p25 12; p75 77,5) meses. Un total de 188 receptores de 275 (68,3%) tenían algún factor de riesgo clásico. La incidencia anual fue de 0,14% el primer año y de 0,98% la acumulada en 10 años postrasplante. El periodo de seguimiento postrasplante de los receptores fue de 3 a 22 años. Durante el seguimiento 172 pacientes murieron (62,5%) y 103 (37,5%) tuvieron remisión completa. La causa de muerte más frecuente fue la progresión (n=91, 52,9%), seguida de la sepsis (n=24, 13,9%). La supervivencia del paciente después del diagnóstico fue del 51% al año, del 44% al segundo año y del 39% al quinto año. La supervivencia del injerto fue de 48, 39 y 33%, respectivamente. (AU)

Introduction: Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) are heterogeneous lymphoid proliferations in recipients of solid organs which seem to be related to Epstein-Barr virus. The use of antilymphocyte antibodies, Epstein-Barr virus seronegativity in the recipient, acute rejection and CMV infection have been identified as classical risk factors. Material and methods: We have studied, in a retrospective observational study, the incidence of PTLD in a period of 22 years, its relationship with Epstein-Barr virus, presence of classical risk factors and outcome in 21,546 simple adult renal transplant recipients from cadaveric and living donors, transplanted in 21 hospitals from 1990 to 2009. Results: A total of 275 recipients developed PTLD (1.2%), 195 males (70.9%), 80 females (29.1%), aged 59.2 (p25 44.7; p75 68) years. Two hundred forty-five (89.0%) were first transplant recipients and 269 (97.8%) from cadaveric donors. Epstein-Barr virus in the tissue was reported in 94 out of the 155 studied recipients (60.6%) and 86.0% of the proliferations were due to B lymphocytes. PTLD median appearance after transplant were 42 (p25 12; p75 77.5) months. One hundred eighty-eight recipients out of 275 patients (68.3%) had any classical risk factor and the use of antilymphocyte antibodies was the most frequent. During the follow-up, 172 patients died (62.5%) and 103 (37.5%) had a complete remission. The main cause of death was PTLD progression (n=91, 52,9%), followed by sepsis (n=24, 13.9%). The follow-up period post-transplant of the recipients was between 3 and 22 years. The incidence was 0.14% during the first year post-trasplant and 0.98% the cumulative incidence at 10 years. Patient survival after diagnosis was 51, 44 and 39% after one, 2 and 5 years, respectively. Finally, overall graft survival was 48, 39 and 33% at the same periods. (AU)

[Update of the recommendations on the management of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) in kidney transplant patients.] / Actualización de las recomendaciones en el manejo de la pandemia por coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) en pacientes con trasplante renal.

SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19) has had a significant impact on transplant activity in our country. Mortality and the risk of complications associated with COVID-19 in kidney transplant recipients (KT) were expected to be higher due to their immunosuppressed condition and the frequent associated comorbidities. Since the beginning of the pandemic in March 2020 we have rapidly improved our knowledge about the epidemiology, clinical features and management of COVID-19 post-transplant, resulting in a better prognosis for our patients. KT units have been able to adapt their programs to this new reality, normalizing both donation and transplantation activity in our country.This manuscript presents a proposal to update the general recommendations for the prevention and treatment of infection in this highly vulnerable population such as KT.

Incidence of Lymphoproliferative Disorders After Renal Transplantation is Down, but the Poor Prognosis Remains. Multicenter 32-Year Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders represent rare but serious complications of kidney transplantation. METHODS: We assessed incidence, risk factors, and outcomes in 21,546 patients receiving grafts between 1990 and 2009. Data were compared by decade of transplant (1990-1999 vs 2000-2009). Patients were followed for at least 12 years over a 32-year study period. RESULTS: In total, 331 patients (1.5%) developed PTLD: 189 of 9740 transplanted in the first decade, and 142 of 11,806 in the second. Incidence decreased significantly (19.40 vs12.02 cases/1000 patients; P < .001). Mean age at diagnosis was 50.2 years (standard deviation 14.7), and the median time from transplant to PTLD diagnosis was 48 months (interquartile range, 14.7-77.5), with no difference between cohorts. The origin of PTLD was mostly (86%) B-cell proliferation. No classical risk factors were reported in 31.7% of affected patients. Compared with 2000 to 2009, in 1990 to 1999 there was a higher frequency of induction therapy (P = .023) and detection of the Epstein-Barr virus in lymphoproliferative tissue (71.3% vs 52.7% P = .019). After diagnosis, 1- and 5-year patient survival was 51% and 38%. Graft survival was 48% and 33%. Survival was stable throughout the study period. CONCLUSION: Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders have a low and decreasing incidence, but the poor prognosis has not changed.

Live donor kidney transplantation. Situation analysis and roadmap.

Living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) is the best treatment option for end stage renal disease in terms of both patient and graft survival. However, figures on LDKT in Spain that had been continuously growing from 2005 to 2014, have experienced a continuous decrease in the last five years. One possible explanation for this decrease is that the significant increase in the number of deceased donors in Spain during the last years, both brain death and controlled circulatory death donors, might have generated the false idea that we have coped with the transplant needs. Moreover, a greater number of deceased donor kidney transplants have caused a heavy workload for the transplant teams. Furthermore, the transplant teams could have moved on to a more conservative approach to the information and assessment of patients and families considering the potential long-term risks for donors in recent papers. However, there is a significant variability in the LDKT rate among transplant centers and regions in Spain independent of their deceased donor rates. This fact and the fact that LDKT is usually a preemptive option for patients with advanced chronic renal failure, as time on dialysis is a negative independent factor for transplant outcomes, lead us to conclude that the decrease in LDKT depends on other factors. Thus, in the kidney transplant annual meeting held at ONT site in 2018, a working group was created to identify other causes for the decrease of LDKT in Spain and its relationship with the different steps of the process. The group was formed by transplant teams, a representative of the transplant group of the Spanish Society of Nephrology (SENTRA), a representative of the Spanish Society of Transplants (SET) and representatives of the Spanish National Transplant Organization (ONT). A self-evaluation survey that contains requests about the phases of the LDKT processes (information, donor work out, informed consent, surgeries, follow-up and human resources) were developed and sent to 33 LDKT teams. All the centers answered the questionnaire. The analysis of the answers has resulted in the creation of a national analysis of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats (SWOT) of the LDKT program in Spain and the development of recommendations targeted to improve every step of the donation process. The work performed, the conclusions and recommendations provided, have been reflected in the following report: Spanish living donor kidney transplant program assessment: recommendations for optimization. This document has also been reviewed by a panel of experts, representatives of the scientific societies (Spanish Society of Urology (AEU), Spanish Society of Nephrology Nursery (SEDEN), Spanish Society of Immunology (SEI/GETH)) and the patient association ALCER. Finally, the report has been submitted to public consultation, reaching ample consensus. In addition, the transplant competent authorities of the different regions in Spainhave adopted the report at institutional level. The work done and the recommendations to optimize LDKT are summarized in the present manuscript, organized by the different phases of the donation process.

Defining a Methylation Signature Associated With Operational Tolerance in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Operational tolerance after kidney transplantation is defined as stable graft acceptance without the need for immunosuppression therapy. However, it is not clear which cellular and molecular pathways are driving tolerance in these patients. We performed genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from kidney transplant recipients with chronic rejection and operational tolerance from the Genetic Analysis of Molecular Biomarkers of Immunological Tolerance (GAMBIT) study. Our results showed that both clinical stages diverge in 2737 genes, indicating that each one has a specific methylation signature associated with transplant outcome. We also observed that tolerance is associated with demethylation in genes involved in immune function, including B and T cell activation and Th17 differentiation, while in chronic rejection it is associated with intracellular signaling and ubiquitination pathways. Using co-expression network analysis, we selected 12 genomic regions that are specifically hypomethylated or hypermethylated in tolerant patients. Analysis of these genes in transplanted patients with low dose of steroids showed that these have a similar methylation signature to that of tolerant recipients. Overall, these results demonstrate that methylation analysis can mirror the immune status associated with transplant outcome and provides a starting point for understanding the epigenetic mechanisms associated with tolerance.

A Current Review of the Etiology, Clinical Features, and Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection in Renal Transplant Patients.

Urinary tract infection (UTI) represents the most common infection after kidney transplantation and remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in kidney transplant (KT) recipients, with a potential impact on graft survival. UTIs after KT are usually caused by Gram-negative microorganisms. Other pathogens which are uncommon in the general population should be considered in KT patients, especially BK virus since an early diagnosis is necessary to improve the prognosis. UTIs following kidney transplantation are classified into acute simple cystitis, acute pyelonephritis/complicated UTI, and recurrent UTI, due to their different clinical presentation, prognosis, and management. Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) represents a frequent finding after kidney transplantation, but ASB is considered to be a separate entity apart from UTI since it is not necessarily a disease state. In fact, current guidelines do not recommend routine screening and treatment of ASB in KT patients, since a beneficial effect has not been shown. Harmful effects such as the development of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria and a higher incidence of Clostridium difficile diarrhea have been associated with the antibiotic treatment of ASB.

Live donor kidney transplantation. Situation analysis and roadmap. / Trasplante renal de donante vivo. Análisis de situación y hoja de ruta.

Living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) is the best treatment option for end stage renal disease in terms of both patient and graft survival. However, figures on LDKT in Spain that had been continuously growing from 2005 to 2014, have experienced a continuous decrease in the last five years. One possible explanation for this decrease is that the significant increase in the number of deceased donors in Spain during the last years, both brain death and controlled circulatory death donors, might have generated the false idea that we have coped with the transplant needs. Moreover, a greater number of deceased donor kidney transplants have caused a heavy workload for the transplant teams. Furthermore, the transplant teams could have moved on to a more conservative approach to the information and assessment of patients and families considering the potential long-term risks for donors in recent papers. However, there is a significant variability in the LDKT rate among transplant centers and regions in Spain independent of their deceased donor rates. This fact and the fact that LDKT is usually a preemptive option for patients with advanced chronic renal failure, as time on dialysis is a negative independent factor for transplant outcomes, lead us to conclude that the decrease in LDKT depends on other factors. Thus, in the kidney transplant annual meeting held at ONT site in 2018, a working group was created to identify other causes for the decrease of LDKT in Spain and its relationship with the different steps of the process. The group was formed by transplant teams, a representative of the transplant group of the Spanish Society of Nephrology (SENTRA), a representative of the Spanish Society of Transplants (SET) and representatives of the Spanish National Transplant Organization (ONT). A self-evaluation survey that contains requests about the phases of the LDKT processes (information, donor work out, informed consent, surgeries, follow-up and human resources) were developed and sent to 33 LDKT teams. All the centers answered the questionnaire. The analysis of the answers has resulted in the creation of a national analysis of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats (SWOT) of the LDKT program in Spain and the development of recommendations targeted to improve every step of the donation process. The work performed, the conclusions and recommendations provided, have been reflected in the following report: Spanish living donor kidney transplant program assessment: recommendations for optimization. This document has also been reviewed by a panel of experts, representatives of the scientific societies (Spanish Society of Urology (AEU), Spanish Society of Nephrology Nursery (SEDEN), Spanish Society of Immunology (SEI/GETH)) and the patient association ALCER. Finally, the report has been submitted to public consultation, reaching ample consensus. In addition, the transplant competent authorities of the different regions in Spain have adopted the report at institutional level. The work done and the recommendations to optimize LDKT are summarized in the present manuscript, organized by the different phases of the donation process.

COVID-19 in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients in Spain Throughout 2020: Catching the Wave?

BACKGROUND: Few studies have analyzed differences in clinical presentation and outcomes in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) across different pandemic waves. METHODS: In this multicenter, nationwide, prospective study, we compared demographics and clinical features, therapeutic management, and outcomes in SOT recipients diagnosed with COVID-19 in Spain before (first wave) or after (second wave) 13 July 2020. RESULTS: Of 1634 SOT recipients, 690 (42.2%) and 944 (57.8%) were diagnosed during the first and second periods, respectively. Compared with the first wave, recipients in the second were younger (median: 63 y [interquartile range, IQR: 53-71] versus 59 y [IQR: 49-68]; P < 0.001) and less likely to receive anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 drugs (81.8% versus 8.1%; P < 0.001), with no differences in immunomodulatory therapies (46.8% versus 47.0%; P = 0.931). Adjustment of immunosuppression was less common during the second period (76.4% versus 53.6%; P < 0.001). Hospital admission (86.7% versus 58.1%; P < 0.001), occurrence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (34.1% versus 21.0%; P < 0.001), and case-fatality rate (25.8% versus 16.7%; P < 0.001) were lower in the second period. In multivariate analysis, acquiring COVID-19 during the first wave was associated with an increased risk of death (OR: 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-1.93; P = 0.005), although this impact was lost in the subgroup of patients requiring hospital (OR: 0.97; 95% CI, 0.73-1.29; P = 0.873) or intensive care unit admission (OR: 0.65; 95% CI, 0.35-1.18; P = 0.157). CONCLUSIONS: We observed meaningful changes in demographics, therapeutic approaches, level of care, and outcomes between the first and second pandemic waves. However, outcomes have not improved in the more severe cases of posttransplant COVID-19.

The APOB polymorphism rs1801701 A/G (p.R3638Q) is an independent risk factor for early-onset coronary artery disease: Data from a Spanish cohort.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Apoliprotein B (ApoB) has been associated with hypercholesterolemia and ischemic coronary disease. This study was aimed to determine the effect of two APOB gene variants in the risk of developing early-onset coronary artery disease (EO-CAD) in a Spanish population. The association of these polymorphisms with hypercholesterolemia was also analysed. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study involved a total of 889 healthy population controls (397 male) and 790 EO-CAD cases (636 male; EO-CAD was defined as male <60 years and women <65 years). All the patients had at least one vessel with angiography documented atherosclerotic lesion. Patients and controls were genotyped for the APOB variants rs1801701 A/G (p.R3638Q) and rs1367117 C/T (p.T98I). Allele and genotype frequencies were compared between the groups (patients vs. controls, hyper-vs. normo-cholesterolemia) by logistic regression. The rs1801701 was significantly associated with EO-CAD in male (OR = 1.44, 95%CI = 1.05-1.99) and female (OR = 2.22, 95%CI = 1.58-3.14). This SNP was significantly associated with hypercholesterolemia in female, with a trend in male. The association with EO-CAD was independent of hypercholesterolemia (multiple logistic regression). CONCLUSION: A common APOB polymorphism (rs1801701) was an independent risk factor for EO-CAD in our population. The risk-effect was more significant in female than in male.

Úlceras en el colon tras la toma de resina de poliestireno sulfonato cálcico / Colonic mucosal ulceration following administration of calcium polystryrene sulfonate

No disponible

Recovery of kidney function in patients treated with maintenance dialysis-a report from the ERA-EDTA Registry.

BACKGROUND: Literature on recovery of kidney function (RKF) in patients with end-stage kidney disease treated with maintenance dialysis (i.e. >90 days) is limited. We assessed the incidence of RKF and its associated characteristics in a European cohort of dialysis patients. METHODS: We included adult patients from the European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association Registry who started maintenance dialysis in 1997-2016. Sustained RKF was defined as permanent discontinuation of dialysis. Temporary discontinuation of ≥30 days (non-sustained RKF) was also evaluated. Factors associated with RKF adjusted for potential confounders were studied using Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: RKF occurred in 7657 (1.8%) of 440 996 patients, of whom 71% experienced sustained RKF. Approximately 90% of all recoveries occurred within the first 2 years after Day 91 of dialysis. Of patients with non-sustained RKF, 39% restarted kidney replacement therapy within 1 year. Sustained RKF was strongly associated with the following underlying kidney diseases (as registered by the treating physician): tubular necrosis (irreversible) or cortical necrosis {adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 20.4 [95% confidence interval (CI) 17.9-23.1]}, systemic sclerosis [aHR 18.5 (95% CI 13.8-24.7)] and haemolytic uremic syndrome [aHR 17.3 (95% CI 13.9-21.6)]. Weaker associations were found for haemodialysis as a first dialysis modality [aHR 1.5 (95% CI 1.4-1.6)] and dialysis initiation at an older age [aHR 1.8 (95% CI 1.6-2.0)] or in a more recent time period [aHR 2.4 (95% CI 2.1-2.7)]. CONCLUSIONS: Definitive discontinuation of maintenance dialysis is a rare and not necessarily an early event. Certain clinical characteristics, but mostly the type of underlying kidney disease, are associated with a higher likelihood of RKF.

Cistatina C en la estimación de la función renal en candidatos a trasplante hepático / Cystatin C in estimation of renal function in liver transplantation candidates

No disponible

IL17RA in early-onset coronary artery disease: Total leukocyte transcript analysis and promoter polymorphism (rs4819554) association.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The interleukin-17 (IL-17) pathway would play an important role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and coronary-artery disease (CAD). The IL-17 inflammatory mediators are expressed by Th17 cells, a group of CD4 + leukocytes that infiltrate the vascular milieu and are pivotal in the origin, progression, stability and rupture of the atherosclerotic lesion. Cigarette smoke compounds stimulated the expression of IL-17 and IL-17-receptors. In atherogenic mice models the deficiency of IL-17RA resulted in a reduction of the atherosclerotic lesion size and leukocyte infiltrate. We hypothesised that common the IL-17RA transcript might be differential expressed in the leukocytes from CAD patients and healthy individuals. METHODS: The relative amount of the IL-17RA to ACTB transcript was determined in total leukocytes of 55 patients and 50 controls, all smokers. We genotyped the IL-17RA rs48195554 promoter polymorphisms in 390 healthy controls and 450 early-onset CAD patients. RESULTS: Patients showed significantly higher mean IL-17RA normalised transcript value than controls (p < 0.001). For the IL-17RA rs48195554 promoter polymorphisms, IL-17RA G-carriers showed higher transcript values. However, allele and genotype frequencies did not differ between patients and controls and we thus excluded a significant association with CAD. CONCLUSIONS: The higher levels of the IL-17RA transcript among CAD-patients was in agreement with a role for the IL-17 pathway in the pathogenesis of coronary atherosclerosis.